SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 1428

T.MATHIVANAN
D. Prabhakar – Appellant
Versus
Durai Kannu Naicker – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:J. Sudhakaran, Advocate. For the Respondents:R. Murali, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. Invoking the proviso under Section 482 Cr.P.C., this petition is filed by the petitioners to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.640 of 2005 which is pending on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Alandur.

2. The background facts warranted to file this petition are detailed as under.

3. The petitioners are accused No.3 & 4 in the case in C.C.No.640 of 2005 which is pending on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Alandur. The respondent herein has filed this complaint under Section 190(1)(a) of Cr.P.C. against four persons which includes the petitioners herein, to deal with them under Sections 406, 417, 420, 465, 471 and 120(B) of IPC. The accused 1 and 2 have been declared as proclaimed offenders by an order of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Alandur dated 28.05.2009. Thereafter the case against them has been split up and numbered as C.C.No.550 of 2010 which is also pending before the said Court.

4. The respondent has alleged in his complaint that he is the owner of a piece of land comprised in Survey No.565/1 and 674/1 measuring 10 cents at Sholinganalur Village. He was badly in need of money to met out the marriage expenses of his daughter. He was info











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top