SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 1073

R.S.RAMANATHAN
K. Vembadurai – Appellant
Versus
Padmavathy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:K.S. Jeyaganeshan, Advocate. For the Respondent:A.R. Nixon, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. The husband is the appellant. He filed a petition for divorce on the ground of desertion.

2. The case of the appellant was that the marriage took place on 5.7.1971 and within a few months from the date of marriage, the respondent left the matrimonial home without any justifiable cause, to her parents house and then she returned to the matrimonial home after request made by the appellant and thereafter in November 1972 she again left the matrimonial home without any reasonable and justifiable cause. A female child was born in February 1973 and the appellant and his parents were not permitted to see the child. The respondent also refused to come and live with the appellant. The respondent also filed O.S.No.364 of 1974 for maintenance and maintenance was ordered. Even for the daughter's marriage, he was not invited. As the respondent is living separately without reasonable and justifiable cause from 1972 onwards, the petition was filed for divorce.

3. The respondent denied the allegations made in the petition and stated that she was driven away from the house by the appellant and his parents and they demanded 50 sovereigns and even after the birth of the child, they did















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top