SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 1770

R.MALA
M. Ramasamy Gounder – Appellant
Versus
Palanimalai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:D. Shivakumaran, Advocate. For the Respondent:D. Vairamoorthy, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. Criminal Revision Case against the order dated 4.2.2009 in Crl.R.P.No.30 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Namakkal, whereby the maintenance of Rs.750/- p.m. was ordered each to the petitioners to be paid from the date of maintenance case and the said amount of Rs.750/- had been reduced from Rs.1,500/-p.m. granted by order dated 28.9.2007 in M.C.No.3 of 2007 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Namakkal.


2. The averments in the petition for maintenance are as follows:

The petitioners are the parents of the respondent. The respondent-son has taken fraudulent land and allotted 1.10 acres of land to the petitioners, which is not fit for cultivation. Since the petitioners-parents are aged, they are unable to maintain themselves, and hence they have filed the petition for maintenance before the trial Court, claiming maintenance of Rs.3,000/- to each of them, from the respondent.

3. The respondent-son has filed counter affidavit stating that there was a partition on 21.9.1995, whereby A schedule property has been allotted to the first petitioner-father and B schedule property has been allotted to the respondent-son. The first petitioner-fath








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top