S.TAMILVANAN
Ponnammal – Appellant
Versus
S. V. Subramanian – Respondent
1. Heard Mr.N.Manoharan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, the learned Senior counsel for the respondent.
2. This revision has been preferred challenging the order dated 06.11.2009 made in I.A.No.168 of 2008 in O.S.No.536 of 1997 on the file of the Second Additional Subordinate Court, Erode.
3. It is not in dispute that the respondent herein had filed a suit in O.S.No.536 of 1997 against the defendants 10, 12 and 13 who were petitioners 1 to 3 herein. After filing the suit, the petitioners herein were arrayed as defendants 10, 12 and 13, on the ground that they purchased certain shares from the first defendant namely Mr.Veerappa Gounder (died).
4. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, an exparte decree was passed on 18.09.1996 by the Court below on 18.09.2006. To set aside the exparte decree, the petitioners have filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C. along with petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 679 days in filing the petition to set aside the exparte decree. By the impugned order, the said petition, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act filed by the petitioners
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.