V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
S. Anand @ Akash – Appellant
Versus
Vanitha Vijaya Kumar – Respondent
1. In an Article published in "The Matrimonial Strategist" (October 2003) titled "Children as Pawns:Who Determines Custody?", by Lawrence Jay Braunstein, the author states as follows:-
"The division of assets in a divorce is a process rife with potential conflict, which varies according to the value of the assets and relative worth of the parties. More painful and much more difficult, however, is the determination of custody. Children are not assets to be divided. Their lives, already affected by the divorce, will be further impacted by the custody situation. Attorneys and Courts struggle with ways to determine which parent would be the better primary caretaker. If only there were a test ... Because there is not such a determining factor, the legal system has come up with many tests – and people to evaluate them. Rather than simplify the decision, this process may have further complicated it. In addition to the questions of objectivity raised about the tests themselves, there are the questions raised about the individuals who evaluate them."
It is true of every child custody case and the case on hand is no exception.
2. Pending the main original petition O.P.No.12 of 2011,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.