SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 2173

G.RAJASURIA
Manivannan – Appellant
Versus
Thenmozhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
For the Appellant:N. Suresh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:R. Karunakaran, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. This second appeal is filed by the defendant, inveighing the judgement and decree dated 22.12.2008 passed by the Principal District Judge, Villupuram, in A.S.No.58 of 2006, confirming the judgement and decree dated 10.10.2006 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi, in O.S.No.122 of 2001.

2. A recapitulation and 'resume' of facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this second appeal would run thus:

(i) The respondent herein, as plaintiff, filed the suit seeking maintenance.

(ii) The defendant/husband resisted the suit by filing written statement.

(iii) Whereupon the trial Court framed the relevant issues. The plaintiff examined herself as P.W.1 along with P.W.2 and Exs.A1 and A2 were marked. The defendant examined himself as D.W.1 and marked Exs.B1 to B3.

(iv) Ultimately, the trial Court decreed the suit, awarding maintenance of Rs.2500/- per month from the date of suit.

(v) Challenging and impugning the judgement and decree of the trial Court, the appeal was filed for nothing but to be dismissed by the appellate Court, confirming the judgement and decree of the trial Court.

3. Being aggrieved by the judgements and decrees of the Courts below,









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top