VINOD K.SHARMA
N. Adikesavan – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Land Administration, Chennai – Respondent
1. This judgment shall dispose of the following two writ petitions, viz.,
Sl. No.
Case No.
Name of the Petitioner
1
W.P.No.12613 of 2001
1. N.Adikesavan
2. Chinnayan
3. Jayaraman
4. Mangaliammal
5. Paneerselvam
6. Doss
7. Muthian
8. Muthulakshmi
9. Kannan
10. Parvathiammal
11. Ravi
12. Rukmani
13. Gowri
14. Mohan
15. Valmurthy
16. Dilipkumar
17. Neelakandan
18. Logammal
19. Sakunthala
20. Ravayammal
21. Santhanammal
22. Saraswathi
23. Omprakash
24. Sundararaj
25. Sivaraj
26. Kalaivani
27. Murugesh
28. Lingaganapathy
1. Thirunavukkarasu
2. Killiammal
3. Madurai Muthu
4. Karunakaran
5. Mahalingam
6. Ramadoss
as the common question of law and facts are raised in these two writ petitions. For the sake of brevity, facts are being taken from W.P.No.12613 of 2001.
2. The petitioners have invoked the extra-ordinary supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with the prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 14.05.2001, passed by the Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
3. The facts pleaded in support of the petition by B.Balakrishnan, S/o. R.D.Baskar, the Power of Attorney A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.