K.VENKATARAMAN
N. Palaniammal – Appellant
Versus
B. Chandrakala – Respondent
1. The above referred civil revision was filed against the order allowing the application in I.A.No.624 of 2007, an application for amendment of the plaint in O.S.No.453 of 2005 dated 20.01.2009 of the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No.1), Coimbatore.
2. The defendants 2, 4 to 7, 9 and 10 in the above suit are the petitioners and the plaintiff thereon is the 1st respondent and the 11th defendant is the 2nd respondent in this revision.
3. The 1st respondent has filed the said suit for declaration of her title over the suit property and for permanent injunction, restraining the petitioners and the 2nd respondent herein from interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. In the said suit, she filed an application in I.A.No.624 of 2007 for amendment of the plaint incorporating a prayer for recovery of possession. The learned trial Judge allowed the said application and as stated already, the present revision is directed against the said order.
4. The reason for filing the said application as set out by the 1st respondent herein in her application for amendment of the plaint is that while filing the suit, at the first instance
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.