S.TAMILVANAN
Thanikachalam @ P. T. Chalam Rep by his legal Representatives – Appellant
Versus
A. Murugesan – Respondent
(Prayer: Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decreetal order dated 27.06.2005 made in E.A. No.1365 of 2005 in E.P. No.1584 of 2004 in O.S. No.6935 of 1996 on the file of the X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.)
This Civil Revision Petition has been preferred against the order and decreetal order dated 27.06.2005 made in E.A. No.1365 of 2005 in E.P. No.1584 of 2004 in O.S. No.6935 of 1996 on the file of the X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
2. It is seen that the Execution Petition in E.P. No.1584 of 2004 was filed by the respondent/decree holder, pursuant to the decree passed in O.S. No.6935 of 1996 for specific performance of the contact. The Execution Application in E.A. No.1365 of 2005 was filed by the petitioners/judgment debtors under Order XVI Rules 6 and 7 read with Rule 14 of CPC., seeking permission to examine one Doctor Reginald, if he is not available to examine any other competent Doctor attached to the Appolo Hospital, No.21 Greames Lane, Chennai-600 006, to speak about the discharge summary report dated 02.06.1991.
3. It is an admitted fact that the respondent/decree holder had fil
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.