1. The revision petitioners who are arrayed as A1 and A2, have come forward with the above revision challenging the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Pollachi, Coimbatore District dated 16.12.2002 made in CC.No.453/2002 convicting A1 for the offence under Section.205 read with 109 IPC and convicting A2 for the offence under Section.205 IPC and sentencing each of the accused to undergo 4 weeks rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each and in default, to undergo 6 months rigorous imprisonment for their respective convictions.

2. The case of the prosecution is that A2 has impersonated the witness No.2 in a case in C.C.No.546 of 2001 for the offence under Section 379 IPC and deposed falsely in the said case and A1 has abetted the offence committed by A2 and thereby, both of them have been implicated for the offences under Sections 205 read with 109 IPC [A1] and 205 IPC [A2].

3. It is seen that the case was registered by the respondent police on the basis of the complaint preferred by the Head Clerk of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Pollachi, in Crime No.392 of 2002 for the offences under Sections 419 and 420 IPC. The said FIR was re