D. Prasanna vs A. B. Fathima Sulthanam

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2011 Supreme(Mad) 2498

R.BANUMATHI, V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH
D. Prasanna – Appellant
Versus
A. B. Fathima Sulthanam – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants:N.G.R. Prasad, M/s. Row and Reddy, S.R. Rajagopal, V. Anil Kumar, Advocates.
For the Respondents:V. Raghavachari, M/s. Nesreen banu, Chitra Sampath, V. Prakash, Senior ha, D. Nagasaila, T.V. Ramanujam, Senior Counsel, M.A. Srinivasan, V.J. Latha, S. Prabhakaran, R. Annamalai, Advocates.

Judgment :-

V. PERIYA KARUPPIAH, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the learned single Judge in A.No.330 of 2011 in C.S.No.243 of 2011 along with A.Nos. 1805 of 2011 in C.S.No.215 of 2011 and A.Nos. 331 and 1910 of 2011 in C.S.No.243 of 2011 by respondents 2, 7, 8 and 11 (defendants 2, 7 8 and 11 in the suit).

(b) O.S.A.No.116 of 2011

This appeal is directed against the order passed by the learned single Judge in A.No.330 of 2011 in C.S.No.243 of 2011 along with A.Nos. 1805 of 2011 in C.S.No.215 of 2011 and A.Nos. 331 and 1910 of 2011 in C.S.No.243 of 2011 by the first respondent (first defendant).

This appeal is directed against the finding in paragraph 23(c) of the order passed by the learned single Judge in A.No.1805 of 2011 in C.S.No.215 of 2011 along with A.Nos. 331 and 1910 of 2011 in C.S.No.243 of 2011 by the appellants who were the parties sought to be impleaded in the suit.

(d) O.S.A.No.139 of 2011

This appeal is directed against the order passed in A.No.1805 of 2011 in C.S.No.215 of 2011 along with A.Nos. 331 and 1910 of 2011 in C.S.No.243 of 2011 by the applicant/plaintiff.

2. All the four appeals have been preferred by the parties

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2011 Supreme(Mad) 2498

R.BANUMATHI, V.PERIYA KARUPPIAHD. Prasanna – AppellantVersusA. B. Fathima Sulthanam – Respondent

R.BANUMATHI, V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH
D. Prasanna – Appellant
Versus
A. B. Fathima Sulthanam – Respondent