R.MALA
M. Ragu – Appellant
Versus
S. Kumaresan – Respondent
1. The Crl.R.Cs. have been filed against the impugned orders passed in Crl.M.P.Nos.557 and 558 of 2007 in C.C.No.14 of 2007 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate No.4, Coimbatore, directing the revision petitioners to return the material objects/properties and handed over to them for interim custody.
2. The averments in the petitions filed in Crl.M.P.Nos.557 and 558 of 2007 in C.C.No14 of 2007, are as follows:
The second respondent herein filed a case in Cr.No.456 of 2005 for the offence under Section 420 IPC against one Prakash and seized the properties (material objects), namely Silambu Rattinam (TAMIL) and Pinky train and the same were produced before the Court on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioners and the first respondent herein. The petitioners and the first respondent herein are the partners and they have filed applications for interim custody of the properties and as per the order dated 20.6.2005 passed in Crl.M.P.No.4063 of 2005, the interim custody of Silambu Rattinam was granted in favour of the petitioners and the first respondent herein and they were directed to execute a bond for Rs.10 lakhs and similarly, by order dated 24.6.2005
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.