SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 2815

R.S.RAMANATHAN
Lakshmamma – Appellant
Versus
Rathinamma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Mr. V. Nicholas, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. P. Mani, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :-

The defendant, who was successful in the trial Court and lost in the 1st Appellate Court is the appellant.


2. The respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale, dated 30.05.1994 executed by the appellant/defendant in favour of the respondent/plaintiff.

3. The specific case of the respondent/plaintiff was that the suit property belongs to the appellant/defendant and on 30.05.1994, the appellant/defendant agreed to sell the suit property for a consideration of Rs.70,000/- and a sum of Rs.60,000/- was paid as advance and an agreement of sale was also executed on the same day wherein the payment of advance was also mentioned and the defendant agreed to execute a sale deed on receipt of the balance sale consideration from the respondent/plaintiff and a period of three years was fixed in the agreement of sale and the respondent/plaintiff offered to pay the amount and called upon the defendant/appellant to come and execute the sale deed by receiving the balance sale consideration and as the appellant/defendant refused to execute the sale deed, a notice was sent on 05.05.1995 by the respondent/plaintiff to the defendant and even after the rece




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top