1. The learned Judicial Magistrate in C.C.No.146/2005, dated 25.10.2005, convicted the accused for the offence under Sections 506(i) I.P.C. (3 counts) and 506(ii) I.P.C. (5 counts) and sentenced him to undergo two years' simple imprisonment for the offence under Section 506(i) I.P.C. (3 counts) and sentenced him to undergo three years' simple imprisonment for the offence under Section 506(ii) I.P.C. (5 counts) and to run the sentence consecutively. But, he was acquitted for the offence under Sections 193 I.P.C. (7 counts) and 420 I.P.C. (7 counts). The aforesaid judgment was confirmed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Namakkal. But, since the accused was in prison for 743 days, his sentence alone has modified concurrently instead of consecutively, against which, the present revision has been preferred by the accused/revision petitioner.

2.The case of the prosecution is as follows:

On 27.05.2000, P.W.1 Advocate Mr.Palaniappan received notice from the Special Court, Paramathi Vellore, Namakkal District, under Ex.P1 dated 26.05.2000, in which, it was stated that P.W.1 has to pay compensation to one Varadhammal and in respect of the same