G.RAJASURIA
Thanga Sulaiksha Umma – Appellant
Versus
Nagalakshmi – Respondent
1. This Second appeal is focussed by the defendants, animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 23.9.2005 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee, in A.S.No.37 of 2004 reversing the judgment and decree dated 8.4.2004 passed by the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur, in O.S.No.789 of 1996, which was filed for mandatory and permanent injunctions.
2. The parties, for the sake of convenience, are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court.
3. A summation and summarisation of the relevant facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this Second Appeal would run thus:
(a) The respondent herein, as plaintiff, filed the suit seeking the following reliefs:
"To pass a judgement and decree
"a. for declaration of plaintiff's title to the 'B' schedule property and
b) for recovery of vacant possession of the 'B' schedule property after ejecting the defendants therefrom and after removing the superstructure, put-up by the defendants.
c) directing the defendants too pay future damages at the rate of Rs.1,000/-p.m.from the date of the plaint till the date of delivery.
d) directing the defendants to pa
(2006) 5 SCC 545 Hero Vinoth (Minor) V Seshammal
(2011) 1 SCC 673 [Vijay Kumar Talwar v Commissioner of Income Tax
2008(4) SCALE 300 Kashmir Singh V Harnam Singh & anr
AIR 1999 SC 1341 (Iswar Bhai C. Patel v Harihar Behera & anr.) AIR 1999 SC 1441
Chung Ping Kwan & ors. v Lam Island Development Company Limited (Hong Kong) (1997) AC 38
AIR 2001 SC 1158 (Bipin Shantilal Panchal v State of Gujarat & anr.)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.