SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 3589

R.S.RAMANATHAN
S. Ramani – Appellant
Versus
Managing Trustee, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:Mr. M. Mahendra Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. T. Karunakaran, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :-

The unsuccessful plaintiffs are the appellants herein. The appellants/plaintiffs filed the suit for injunction, restraining the respondent from resorting to any unlawful acts to evict them from the suit property.

2. The case of the appellants/plaintiffs was that one Mrs.Perundevi, was the tenant of the suit property under the respondent/defendant. The first plaintiff is the daughter of the said Mrs.Perundevi and the second plaintiff is her son-in-law and they both were living along with Mrs.Perundevi, till her life time and after the death of Mrs.Perundevi also, the appellants/plaintiffs continued to live in the suit property as tenants. As the respondent refused to receive the rent from the appellants/plaintiffs and also attempted to demolish the old building for the purpose of constructing a new building, the suit was filed for the relief stated above.

3. The respondent/defendant contested the suit stating that the grandfather of the first plaintiff viz., Thiru Kanikannan, was the tenant of a portion of 200 sq.ft in the first floor of the suit property and Mrs.Perundevi, continued as a tenant in the suit property and after her death, the plaintiffs claimed to be in posse



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top