R.S.RAMANATHAN
S. Ramani – Appellant
Versus
Managing Trustee, Chennai – Respondent
The unsuccessful plaintiffs are the appellants herein. The appellants/plaintiffs filed the suit for injunction, restraining the respondent from resorting to any unlawful acts to evict them from the suit property.
2. The case of the appellants/plaintiffs was that one Mrs.Perundevi, was the tenant of the suit property under the respondent/defendant. The first plaintiff is the daughter of the said Mrs.Perundevi and the second plaintiff is her son-in-law and they both were living along with Mrs.Perundevi, till her life time and after the death of Mrs.Perundevi also, the appellants/plaintiffs continued to live in the suit property as tenants. As the respondent refused to receive the rent from the appellants/plaintiffs and also attempted to demolish the old building for the purpose of constructing a new building, the suit was filed for the relief stated above.
3. The respondent/defendant contested the suit stating that the grandfather of the first plaintiff viz., Thiru Kanikannan, was the tenant of a portion of 200 sq.ft in the first floor of the suit property and Mrs.Perundevi, continued as a tenant in the suit property and after her death, the plaintiffs claimed to be in posse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.