1. The Crl.R.C. is filed against the order dated 28.1.2005 in Crl.M.P.No.3066 of 2005 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate's Court, Madurantakam.

2. The respondents/accused filed an application for return of documents which were seized by the revision petitioner/complainant/Enforcement Officer of Provident Funds, for production before the enquiry under Section 7-A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act and the proceedings have been over and the respondents/accused have come forward with such application for return of the documents, and the said application was allowed, against which, the revision petitioner/complainant has preferred this Crl.R.C.

3. Challenging the impugned order, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner/complainant submitted that those documents related to the years 1987-88 to 1993-94 and those records are not necessary for the administration of the School. It is true that the documents were seized and verified and during the shifting of the office, they have been misplaced and prayed for setting aside the impugned order passed by the trial Court.

4. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondents/acc