SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 2336

S.TAMILVANAN
J. Vincent – Appellant
Versus
T. L. Narayanamoorthy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:M. Kumarasamy, Advocate.
For the Respondent:A.V. Munusamy, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. C.R.P.(NPD).No.3917 of 2010 is preferred by the petitioner / tenant, J.Vincent against the Judgment and Decree, dated 02.08.2010 made in R.C.A.No.12 of 2007 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority / VII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai, confirming the order and decretal order, dated 30.11.2006 made in R.C.O.P.No.353 of 2006 on the file of the Rent Controller / XII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.

2. C.R.P.(NPD).No.3918 of 2010 is preferred by the petitioner / tenant, Ukkamaraj Amlokchand against the Judgment and Decree, dated 02.08.2010 made in R.C.A.No.13 of 2007 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority / VII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai, confirming the order and decretal order, dated 30.11.2006 made in R.C.O.P.No.354 of 2006 on the file of the Rent Controller / XII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.

3. C.R.P.(NPD).No.3919 of 2010 is preferred by the petitioner / tenant, S.Meganathan against the Judgment and Decree, dated 02.08.2010 made in R.C.A.No.14 of 2007 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority / VII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai, confirming the order and decretal order, dated 30.11.2006 made in








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top