SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1901 Supreme(Mad) 124

CHARLES ARNOLD WHITE
Punithavelu Mudaliar – Appellant
Versus
Bhashyam Aiyangar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Charles Arnold White, CJ.

1. This is an appeal from an order of Boddam, J., dismissing an application by a judgment-creditor of an insolvent for an order that a sum of Rs. 3,400 in the hands of the Official Assignee should be paid by the Official Assignee to the judgment-creditor (the appellant).

2. A preliminary objection was taken by the Official Assignee that no appeal lay from the order of the learned Judge. I think the order is a "Judgment" within the meaning of article 15 of the Letters Patent and that the preliminary objection should be overruled.

3. The facts are these. By an instrument, dated 13th March 1897, one C. Bhashyam Aiyangar, who was afterwards adjudged an insolvent, in consideration of a sum of Rs. 5,600 found due from him 1 to the appellant on a settlement of accounts, covenanted to repay this sum to the appellant in quarterly instalments and mortgaged to the appellant his stock-in-trade and all outstandings and moneys then due and owing and thereafter to become due and payable to the mortgagor. The deed also provided that so long as the principal and interest remained unpaid the mortgagee should be permitted to inspect the books of account and other stock







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top