SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1903 Supreme(Mad) 91

Manavikraman – Appellant
Versus
Moyankutti – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The decree of the Subordinate Judge is clearly wrong, The Judgment-debtor gets no option under a decree for the return of moveable property. The money amount inserted in the decree is inserted under Section 208 of the Civil Procedure Code which requires that an amount of money should be inserted in the decree as an alternative if delivery cannot be had. It is therefore only when after putting in force Section 259 of the C.P.C. it is found that it is impossible to obtain the property ordered to be delivered that the alternative amount in the decree comes into operation.

2. We set aside the decree of the Subordinate Judge and restore that of the District Munsif with costs in this and in the lower appellate Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top