SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1905 Supreme(Mad) 54

S.SUBRAHMANIA AYYAR, BODDAM
P. V. Muthar Sahib Maraikayar – Appellant
Versus
P. M. K. Kadir Sahib Maraikayar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. Subramania Aiyar, C.J.

1. The plaintiffs case in short is as follows. The defendants Nos. 1 to 6 traded in Ceylon under the name and style of S.M.P.M.K., and, while so trading, the firm obtained twenty-five negotiable promissory notes from different persons and indorsed the same to one Meyyappa Chotty, who again indorsed them to the Bank of Madras at Colombo. On the presentation of the notes on behalf of the bank to the makers the notes were dishonoured. The said Meyyappa Ohetty paid the bank and obtained a return of them. The defendants firm gave the said Meyyappa Chetty three other promissory notes payable to him or to his order which were indorsed by Meyyappa Chetty in I favour of the bank and similarly returned to him on his payment to the bank after they also had been dishonoured. Subsequently, in consideration of Rs. 1,500 paid by the plaintiff to him, Meyyappa Chetty assigned in Ceylon his right to the notes by an instrument, dated the 9th April 1901. The defendants on demand failed to pay the amount due by them upon the notes. The present suit is for the recovery of the amount due in respect of five out of the promissory notes made payable to the firm and one out








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top