SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1908 Supreme(Mad) 25

Kommineni Appayya – Appellant
Versus
Mangala Rangayya – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The plaintiff, mortgagee, sues to recover his money by sale of the properties mortgaged, which consist of two parcels of land of which item No. 1 is in the possession of the 3rd defendant, a bona fide purchaser for value without notice of the plaintiffs prior mortgage. The 3rd defendant, appellant, contends that the plaintiff is bound to proceed first against the property, item No. 2, not sold to him and his property No. 1 should be sold only for the balance, if any.

2. Under Section 67 of the Transfer of Property Act the plaintiff is entitled to an order that the properties mortgaged be sold and Section 88 of the same Act provides that the Court shall pass a decree that in default of the defendant paying the mortgage amount, the mortgaged property or a sufficient part be sold and the proceeds applied in discharge of the plaintiffs claim.

3. A second mortgagee of one of the properties mortgaged without notice of the 1st mortgage is entitled under Section 81 of the Transfer of Property Act to have the first mortgage debt paid, so far as it is possible, out of the other properties, but not so as to prejudice the rights of the first mortgagee or of any other person having acq













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top