SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1939 Supreme(Mad) 63

LAKSHMANA RAO
Ganapathi Asari – Appellant
Versus
Kuppuswamy Asari – Respondent


ORDER

Lakshmana Rao, J.

1. The defamatory statement was made in the deposition of the petitioner as a witness in C.C. No. 193 of 1938 on the file of the Sub-Magistrate of Chengam and the finding is that the statement in question was deliberately false. The offence committed would therefore fall under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code which cannot be taken cognizance of without a complaint by the Court and as laid down in Appadurai Nainar, In re (1935)69MLJ812 , parties cannot be allowed to evade the provisions of Section 195(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code by filing a complaint under another provision of the Indian Penal Code. The conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code are therefore set aside and the fine if levied will be refunded.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top