IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Lakshmana Rao, J.
Ganapathi Asari
Versus
Kuppuswamy Asari
Decided On : 09.02.1939
False Statement - Defamation - The court set aside the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code due to the deliberate false statement made in the deposition, which fell under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code and required a complaint by the Court under Section 195(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Fact of the Case:
The defamatory statement was made in the deposition of the petitioner as a witness in C.C. No. 193 of 1938 on the file of the Sub-Magistrate of Chengam, and it was found to be deliberately false.
Finding of the Court:
The court set aside the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and ordered the refund of the fine, as the offence committed fell under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code, which required a complaint by the Court under Section 195(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Issues: The issue was whether the deliberate false statement made by the petitioner in the deposition warranted the application of Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code and required a complaint by the Court under Section 195(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi: The deliberate false statement made by the petitioner in the deposition fell under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code, and as per the provisions of Section 195(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the offence could not be taken cognizance of without a complaint by the Court.
Final Decision: The court set aside the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code, and ordered the refund of the fine.
Lakshmana Rao, J.
1. The defamatory statement was made in the deposition of the petitioner as a witness in C.C. No. 193 of 1938 on the file of the Sub-Magistrate of Chengam and the finding is that the statement in question was deliberately false. The offence committed would therefore fall under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code which cannot be taken cognizance of without a complaint by the Court and as laid down in Appadurai Nainar, In re (1935)69MLJ812 , parties cannot be allowed to evade the provisions of Section 195(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code by filing a complaint under another provision of the Indian Penal Code. The conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code are therefore set aside and the fine if levied will be refunded.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.