SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1939 Supreme(Mad) 35

PANDRANG ROW


ORDER

Pandrang Row, J.

1. The District Judge of Vizagapatam made an order under Sections 476 and 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code directing that a complaint should be preferred charging one D.S. Raju Gupta, Managing Director, Bharathamatha Commonwealth Insurance Bank, Ltd., Vizagapatam, with offences punishable under Sections 465 and 467 read with Sections 109 and 471, Indian Penal Code. The person against whom the complaint has been ordered to be lodged presents an appeal from the order. A right of appeal is given by Section 476-B, Criminal Procedure Code, from the order in question, but it has been objected to by the office that the appeal should be filed on the civil side of this Court and not on the criminal side, in view of Rule 37 of the Criminal Rules of Practice and Orders, 1931. The Advocate for the appellant insists that he is entitled to file an appeal on the criminal side. The question is whether his contention is right. The learned Advocate has referred me to several important decisions which bear on the point, namely, Janardhana Rao v. Lakshmi Narasamma AIR1934Mad52 , Dhanpat Ram I.L.R. (1931)13 Lah. 342 and Emperor v. Bhatu Sadu I.L.R. (1938) Bom. 331 . These Full Be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top