SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1939 Supreme(Mad) 134

ALFRED HENRY LIONEL LEACH
The Trichinopoly Varthaga Sangam, Limited, by its Secretary A. Arulanandam Pillai – Appellant
Versus
T. N. Shanmughasundaram – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.

1. The appellant was the plaintiff in a suit filed in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Trichinopoly to enforce a mortgage executed by three brothers, Nataraja, Nilamegham and Manickavachagam Pillai, sons of one Chockalingam Pillai. Chockalingam had five sons, the other two being named Chandrasekharam and Muthuvelu respectively. The family was joint until the 30th January, 1919, when Chockalingam and his sons executed a deed of partition. The deed provided that three houses (which had been used as the family residence) should be held by the members of the family as tenants in common, but no member should have the right to dispose of his share to a stranger. Chockalingam and Muthuvelu died shortly after the execution of the deed. On the 20th August, 1925, Nataraja, Nilamegham, Chandrasekharam and Manickavachagam on behalf of themselves and their respective sons executed in favour of the appellant a mortgage of the three houses to secure a loan of Rs. 6,000. This loan was repaid in part, but on the 25th October, 1928, a fresh mortgage of the property was executed to secure the sum of Rs. 5,000, Chandrasekharam did not join in the later mortg

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top