SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1939 Supreme(Mad) 165

BURN
Vedula Lakshminarasimhamurti styled as Nittala Lakshminarasimhamurti – Appellant
Versus
Meduri Venkata Jogisomayajulu – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Burn, J.

1. These are cross-appeals from the order of the learned Subordinate Judge of Rajahmundry passed on E.A. No. 626 of 1935 in O.S. No. 68 of 1919. The decree-holders in this execution petition sought to recover from the judgment-debtors four sums of money; costs in O.S. No. 68 of 1919 ordered by the decree of the Court to be paid by the guardian of the first defendant to plaintiffs 2 to 4 amounting to Rs. 666-8-0, interest on the same sum from 16th October, 1923, to 15th September, 1935, at 6 per cent, per annum amounting to Rs. 476-8-9, the costs decreed in A.S. No. 134 of 1924 on the file of this High Court amounting to Rs. 465-1-6 and costs in C.M.P. No. 2774 of 1927 on the file of this High Court amounting to Rs. 402-13-0. The learned Subordinate Judge held that the legal representatives of the first judgment-debtor Vedula Ramakrishnamma should be added in the execution petition and that execution should proceed against any self-acquired properties of the first judgment-debtor in their hands for the recovery of the first two items, namely, Rs. 666-8-0 and interest Rs. 476-8-9. He directed that with regard to the remaining two sums all the joint family property of



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top