SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1939 Supreme(Mad) 233

Thirugnanavalli Ammal – Appellant
Versus
P. Venugopala Pillai – Respondent


ORDER

1. This is an application by a decree-holder for the amendment of a decree passed by this Court on the 30th August, 1932, on the ground that there has been an accidental omission. The petitioner obtained a decree in the Court of the District Judge of South Arcot for the payment of two sums, Rs. 10,817 and Rs. 11,183, with interest at 9 per cent, per annum. On the first amount interest was to be calculated from the 16th March, 1925, and on the second amount from the 16th March, 1926, "till this date", that is, the date of the decree, the 21st December, 1928. There was no reference to further interest in the judgment and the decree was drawn up in accordance with the judgment which was signed by the District Judge who delivered it. On appeal this Court held that the petitioner wag entitled to Rs. 10,276 and Rs. 10,623 with interest on these amounts at six per cent, per annum from 16th March, 1925 and 16th March, 1926, respectively to the date of the decree. Again there was nothing said in the judgment with regard to the payment of further interest after the date of the decree. The draft decree was submitted to the learned Advocates who appeared in the case and they approved of t


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top