SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1939 Supreme(Mad) 320

LAKSHMANA RAO
Patnam Sidda Reddi – Appellant
Versus
Ambati Venkata Girianna – Respondent


ORDER

Lakshmana Rao, J.

1. There is no ground for interference with the order directing further inquiry but it is not permissible under Section 436, Criminal P.C., to direct the Magistrate to frame a charge and dispose of the cage. The direction of the Sessions Judge to frame al charge under Section 147 is therefore set aside and otherwise this petition is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top