SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1939 Supreme(Mad) 190

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Lakshmana Rao, J.
In Re: V. Mekala Venkatappa and Ors.
Versus
Decided On : 02.05.1939

The legal provision under Section 510, I.P.C. does not involve a breach of the peace, impacting the sustainability of the order for security under Section 106, Criminal P.C.

Headnote:

Section 510 - Breach of Peace - The court found that the petitioners were convicted under Section 510, I.P.C., which does not involve a breach of the peace. The order for security under Section 106, Criminal P.C., was deemed unsustainable and set aside.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners were convicted under Section 510, I.P.C., and the order for security under Section 106, Criminal P.C. was challenged.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the order for security under Section 106, Criminal P.C. was unsustainable and set it aside, while dismissing the petitions.

Issues: Conviction under Section 510, I.P.C. and the sustainability of the order for security under Section 106, Criminal P.C.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the fact that the offence under Section 510, I.P.C. did not involve a breach of the peace, leading to the unsustainability of the order for security under Section 106, Criminal P.C.

Final Decision: The order for security under Section 106, Criminal P.C. was set aside, and the petitions were dismissed.

ORDER

Lakshmana Rao, J.

1. The petitioners have been convicted under Section 510, I.P.C., and it is not an offence involving a breach of the peace. The order for security under Section 106, Criminal P.C., is therefore unsustainable and it is set aside. Otherwise] these petitions are dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top