SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1941 Supreme(Mad) 98

PATANJALI SASTRI
Sree Raja Velugoti Navaneetha Krishna Yachendra Bahadur Varu – Appellant
Versus
Sirigiri Ramanujulu Chetty by next friend Irla Pullaiah Chetty – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Patanjali Sastri, J.

1. This civil revision petition arises out of an application filed by the respondent in the Court of the Special Deputy Collector, Chandragiri, under Section 15 (4) of the Madras Agriculturists Relief Act. In order to obtain the benefits of the Act, the respondent who is the proprietor of the Muddumudi village, an agraharam situated in the Kalahasti zamindari, paid into Court Rs. 21-12-2 being the jodi alleged to be due to the petitioner herein, who is the representative in interest of the zamindar, and prayed for a declaration that the rent due for Fasli 1347 had been fully paid up. The petitioner pleaded that the jodi payable by the respondent was not rent as defined by Section 3 (iv) of the Act and that therefore the Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the application. This objection was overruled by the Court below and the only question for determination in this civil revision petition is whether the petitioners contention is correct.

2. The term rent is defined for the purposes of the Act as meaning not only rent as defined by the Madras Estates Land Act but also quit rent, jodi, kattubadi, poruppu or the like payable to the landholder of an estat










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top