SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1941 Supreme(Mad) 169

LAKSHMANA RAO
The Public Prosecutor – Appellant
Versus
Jevan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Lakshmana Rao, J.

1. These are appeals by the Provincial Government against the orders of acquittal of the respondents of an offence under Section 123 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act.

2. The respondents are drivers of transport vehicles and they were prosecuted under Section 123 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving the vehicles on the public road without a permit authorising the use of the vehicles in a public place. They pleaded that it was the duty of the owner to obtain the permit and accepting their plea the Sub-Magistrate acquitted them.

3. The alleged driving of the transport vehicles on the public road without a permit authorising the use of the vehicles in a public place was not denied by the respondents, and so far as is material, Section 42 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act provides that no owner of a transport vehicle shall use or permit the use of the vehicle in any public place save in accordance with the conditions of a permit authorising the use of the vehicle in that place. The driving of a transport vehicle on the public road without such a permit would certainly contravene Section 42 (1) of the Act; and Section 123 (1) enacts that whoever drives a motor vehicl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top