SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1941 Supreme(Mad) 94

ALFRED HENRY LIONEL LEACH
Kandaswami Thambiran – Appellant
Versus
Vagheesam Pillai, wrongfully styling himself as Ponnambala Desikar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.

1. This reference arises out of a suit filed by the appellant in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Sivaganga to establish the title claimed by him to the office of Pandarasannadhi, or mahant, of the Tiruvannamalai math in the Ramnad District. In his plaint the appellant asked the Court to pass a decree in his favour for inter alia the following reliefs:

(a) Declaring that the first defendant is not entitled to be the Pandarasannadhi of the Thiruvannamalai Athinam and (by way of consequential relief) ejecting him from the office of Pandarasannadhi of the Athinam and restoring its possession to the plaintiff as the only Thambiran of the Athinam qualified and entitled to its headship or at least to be in charge of the math and its properties till a new Pandarasannadhi comes."

"(b) Restraining the first defendant by a perpetual injunction from in any way interfering with the spiritual or secular affairs of the Athinam.

2. The respondent was the first defendant, who claims to be the lawful holder of the office. It is admitted that he is in possession of the properties, but notwithstanding the terms of paragraph (a) of the prayer the appellant said




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top