SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1941 Supreme(Mad) 442

ALFRED HENRY LIONEL LEACH
N. P. L. Egappa Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Em. S. V. L. Ramanathan Chettiar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.

1. The appellant instituted this suit in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Devakottai for a declaration that the decree passed in O.S. No. 88 of 1933 by the Subordinate Judge of Coimbatore is void and therefore not binding on him. When that suit was tried the appellant was a minor and his adoptive mother acted as his guardian-ad-litem at all times material to the present suit. The suit resulted in a decree being passed against him for the payment of the sum of Rs. 31,497-10-6. It had been filed to recover money deposited with a firm belonging to the family in which the appellant was born. Before the suit was instituted he was given in adoption to another family and therefore was not responsible for the liabilities of his fathers family. In the present suit the appellant averred that his guardian-ad-litem had been guilty of gross negligence in that he had not pleaded a partition and in not. proving his adoption. At the hearing the Official Assignee, who is the seventh defendant, raised the contention that the suit was not maintainable unless the plaintiff could show fraud or collusion, although this plea was not raised in his written statem






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top