SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1941 Supreme(Mad) 365

PATANJALI SASTRI
S. Berumull Sowcar – Appellant
Versus
P. Velu Gramany – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Patanjali Sastri, J.

1. This appeal arises out of a suit brought by the appellant in the City Civil Court to enforce an equitable mortgage,

2. A preliminary objection is taken to the maintainability of the appeal on the ground that it is barred by limitation. The decree of the Court below was passed on the 28th August, 1940, and the application for certified copies of the decree and judgment was made on the 29th August. The requisite copy stamps were called for on, the 26th September, but as they were hot deposited in time, the application was rejected on the 30th of the same month. A fresh application for copies was made on the 2nd October. A petition to restore the original application was also filed on the 3rd October. The Court below after hearing the objections of the respondent passed an order on the llth October, that copies be granted on the original application with a note thereon that they were granted in pursuance of the petition to restore the original application which had been rejected. The requisite stamp papers were deposited on the same day and the copies were delivered on the 21st October. It is not disputed that if the time prescribed for filing the appeal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top