SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1941 Supreme(Mad) 6

LAKSHMANA RAO
Ponnambala Thevar – Appellant
Versus
Ramaswamy Iyer – Respondent


ORDER

Lakshmana Rao, J.

1. The evidence justifies the conviction under Section 447, Penal Code, but the eviction of the petitioner was not under Section 163A, Madras Estates Land Act, and the conviction under Section 212(d) and (e) of that Act is unsustainable. The conviction under Section 212(d) and (e), Madras Estates Land Act, is therefore set aside and otherwise this petition is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top