SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1941 Supreme(Mad) 103

LAKSHMANA RAO


ORDER

Lakshmana Rao, J.

1. The petitioner was the Village Munsif of Chetput and he collected Rs. 2-7-0 from P.W. 2 on 15th March 1937 and one rupee from P.W. 3 on 17th April 1937. The amounts were remitted to the treasury on 2lst May and 24th April 1937 respectively before any complaint was received and retention of the amount in the interval would not by itself justify the conviction under Section 409, Penal Code. The conviction of the petitioner under Section 409, Penal Code, is therefore set aside and the fine if levied will be refunded.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top