SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1942 Supreme(Mad) 216

CHANDRASEKHARA.AIYAR
Ghulam Asadullah Khan – Appellant
Versus
Mohamed Ali Khan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Chandrasekhara Ayyar, J.

1. This is a quia timet action by eight plaintiffs against three defendants, all of whom are the heirs and legal representatives of a gentleman called Madhi Hussain Khan, who died on 26th July, 1932, leaving a will under which he appointed the first plaintiff as the sole executor. The first four plaintiffs are the sons and plaintiffs 5 to 8 are the daughters of Madhi Hussain Khan. Defendants 1 and 2 arc his sons and the 3rd defendant is his widow. The first plaintiff obtained probate of his fathers will. On 10th July, 1933, he mortgaged a part of the estate, namely, houses bearing Nos. 50, 51, 51-A, 52 and 53, Peters Road, Royapettah, with the Egmore Benefit Society for a sum of Rs. 30,000 and paid off some debts due by the cstate. This mortgage in favour of the Society contained a power of sale under Section 69 of the Transfer of Property Act. Subsequently all the heirs entered into an agreement about the distribution of the estate and the discharge of their liabilities. Under this agreement plaintiffs 2 to 8 were to take houses Nos. 50, 51, 51-A and 53, Peters Road, Royapettah and were liable to the Egmore Benefit Society in a sum of Rs. 23,070 as













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top