SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1942 Supreme(Mad) 258

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Horwill, J.
In Re: Abdur Shukur Sahib
Versus
Decided On : 05.08.1942

Jurisdiction is determined by the location where the false charge was made, and in this case, it was found to be at Vellore, establishing the jurisdiction of the Magistrate at Vellore.

Headnote:

False Charge - Jurisdiction - The court held that the accused's false charge against police officials was made at Vellore, not at Polur, and therefore the Magistrate having jurisdiction would be the Magistrate at Vellore.

Fact of the Case:

The accused was charged with preferring a false and frivolous charge against police officials at Polur. The accused sent a petition containing false allegations to the District Superintendent of Police, which was posted at Polur and opened by the District Superintendent of Police at Vellore.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the false or frivolous charge was made at Vellore and not at Polur, and therefore the Magistrate having jurisdiction would be the Magistrate at Vellore. The petition was allowed, and the Magistrate was ordered to return the charge-sheet to be presented to the Magistrate having jurisdiction.

Issues: Jurisdiction over the false charge made by the accused.

Ratio Decidendi: The effect of the letter being opened by the District Superintendent of Police at Vellore made the false charge to be considered as made at Vellore, establishing the jurisdiction of the Magistrate at Vellore.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the Magistrate was ordered to return the charge-sheet to be presented to the Magistrate having jurisdiction at Vellore.

ORDER

Horwill, J.

1. The accused was charged by the police with preferring a false and frivolous charge against police officials at Polur.

2. The accused sent a petition containing various allegations, which were subsequently found to be false, to the District Superintendent of Police. His letter was posted at Polur and apparently opened by the District Superintendent of Police at Vellore. The Post Office, therefore, acted as the agent of the accused in carrying this letter to the District Superintendent of Police at North Arcot; and the effect was the same as if the accused had handed over the letter in person to the District Superintendent of Police at Vellore. The false or frivolous charge was therefore made at Vellore and not at Polur. It therefore follows that the Magistrate having jurisdiction would be the Magistrate at Vellore.

3. The petition is therefore allowed and the Magistrate ordered to return the charge-sheet to be presented to the Magistrate having jurisdiction.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top