SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1942 Supreme(Mad) 133

ABDUR RAHMAN
Matte Atchutarama Rao – Appellant
Versus
Solasa Bapanayya, Trustee Vijjapu Kamakshamma Charities – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Abdur Rahaman, J.

1. This appeal arises out of a suit under Section 73 (2), Civil P.C., for refund of certain assets paid to defendant 1 on his application for rateable distribution. The facts which led to the present suit are that one Vijjappu Kamakshamma executed a will on 16th September 1918 bequeathing her stridhanam properties of the value of Rs. 20,000 for the establishment of a public watershed and a public choultry for feeding people and appointed her brother Nalam Subrarnanyam as an executor and a trustee for carrying out her directions contained in the will. On the allegation that Nalam Subramaniam had failed to carry out the directions in his sisters will after her death, a suit O.S. No. 8 of 1932 under Section 92, Civil P.C., was instituted in the Court of the District Judge of East Godavari at Rajahmundry for Nalam Subramaniams removal from the trusteeship and for a settlement of a scheme. Nalam Subranianiam died before filing a written statement and his son and widow were brought on record as his legal representatives. A decree (Ex. B) was eventually passed against these representatives on 11th February under which a scheme was framed by the Court and the prese




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top