SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1942 Supreme(Mad) 116

S. SUBBIAH PILLAI AND SONS – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax, MADRAS. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Honourable the Chief Justice).

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Calcutta, has referred to this court under Section 66 (1) of the Income Tax Act the Following questions :-

" (1) Whether the appeal is liable to be rejected as barred by limitation in the circumstances of the case.

(2) Whether the assessee is entitled t a refund of the deposit of Rs. 100 when the appeal is rejected not on the merits but on the ground of limitation."

The reference discloses a surprising situation, but fortunately it is not likely to arise again. The assessee desired to appeal to the Tribunal against an order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, dated the 24the November, 1940. When this order was passed the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had been constituted, but the assessee did not know, and had not the means of knowing, that the office of the Tribunal was to be opened in New Delhi. Section 33 of the Act, as now amended requires, that an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal shall be presented within sixty days from the date on which the appellant was served with the notice of the order. No rules had been framed regulating the procedure to be followed and








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top