SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1943 Supreme(Mad) 151

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Kuppuswami Aiyar, J.
Sellammal
Versus
Muthuvira Muthirian
Decided On : 29.04.1943

Cruelty established by a husband insisting upon his wife sharing bed with him despite suffering from venereal disease entitles the wife to maintenance

Headnote:

Cruelty - Maintenance - Duty of the Court to find sufficient justification for the wife not living with the husband and claiming maintenance - Husband suffering from venereal disease insisted upon wife sharing bed - Cruelty established - Entitlement to maintenance

Fact of the Case:

Wife filed a petition for maintenance, stating that she was beaten and driven out of the house and refused to share bed with her husband after marriage due to his venereal disease

Finding of the Court:

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate's order dismissing the petition was set aside as it was the duty of the Court to find whether there was sufficient justification for the wife not living with the husband and claiming maintenance

Issues: Sufficient justification for the wife not living with the husband and claiming maintenance

Ratio Decidendi: It is cruel for a husband with venereal disease to insist upon his wife sharing bed with him, establishing cruelty and entitling the wife to maintenance

Final Decision: The order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate dismissing the petition was set aside, and the petition was restored for further proceedings

ORDER

Kuppuswami Aiyar, J.

1. This is a reference by the learned District Magistrate of Trichinopoly for setting aside the order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Musiri dismissing a petition by a wife for maintenance. Her case was that she was beaten and driven out of the house and she refused to share bed with her husband after marriage in view of the fact that he was suffering from venereal disease and she did not want to get infected herself. In Court, the husband offered to take her and live with her and the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate dismissed her petition.

2. As pointed out by the learned District Magistrate it is the duty of the Court to find whether there was sufficient justification for the wife not living with the husband and claiming maintenance. It is certainly cruel on the part of a husband who has got venereal disease to insist upon his wife sharing bed with him, and if this is cruelty, she will be entitled to maintenance. The order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate dismissing the petition is set aside. The petition will be restored to file and disposed of by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Musiri or by such other Magistrate as the District Magistrate may think it necessary or proper to transfer it after giving an opportunity to both sides to let in necessary evidence.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top