SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1943 Supreme(Mad) 143

HORWILL
Sri Silambani Chidambara Vinayagar Devasthanam through its Special Receiver, S. Krishna Ayyar – Appellant
Versus
V. R. L. S. T. R. M. Chidambaram Chettiar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Horwill, J.

1. The suit institution, Sri Silambani Chidambara Vinayagar Devasthanam, is managed by the descendants of one Thungan Chettiar. In 1932, one branch of his family brought a suit O.S. No. 78 of 1932 on the file of the Subordinate Judge of Devakottai, for a declaration that they, as well as the defendants, who are the members of another branch of the family, were entitled to manage the temple properties in accordance with an arrangement entered into in 1907 by an agreement which is marked as Ex. P in this suit. As the affairs of the temple were being neglected because of the quarrel between two branches of the family, a receiver, Mr. S. Krishna Ayyar, was appointed to recover sums of money collected by various members of the family while managing the affairs of the temple. He is the plaintiff in the suit out of which this appeal arises. He contended that the defendant in the suit owed a sum of Rs. 51,759-11-6 to the temple, consisting of Rs. 15,237-5-6 due in 1903 and acknowledged by the defendants father, and the sum of Rs. 36,000 odd by way of interest. The acknowledgment took the form of a hundi, Ex. B. The defendant denied that his father had executed the suit h




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top