Mockett, J.

1. We will deal with these appeals in a common judgment, separating them however as convenient.

2. A.A.O. Nos. 411 and 412 of 1942. - The appellant is. the decree-holder and the respondent is the judgment-debtor, defendant 24 in O.S. No. 86 of 1916, Sub-Judges Court, Chittoor, which was a suit by a junior member of the Kalahasti Zamindari for maintenance against defendant 24. On 6th June 1918, there was a preliminary decree for Rs. 42,658-15-6 which was charged on the whole of the zamindari. In this appeal we are concerned with the sale of Peddakannali village, part of the zamindari. On 23rd November 1920, the final decree was passed. Appeals Nos. 58, 69 and 70 of 1919 were filed by various defendants against the preliminary decree. These appeals were dismissed on 3rd May 1927. E.P. No. 20 of 1930 was filed on 15th January 1930 and an order for sale of Peddakannali village was made on 28th March 1935. On 17th March 1934 one Srinivasa Ayyah was appointed receiver in a suit, O.S. No. 881 of 1914, which had been filed by one Simhachellarn. Srinivasa Ayyah was discharged in February 1936 and in the same month Simhachellam himself was appointed receiver. The sale procl