SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1944 Supreme(Mad) 85

MOCKETT
Ramayya – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmayya – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mockett, J.

1. In this appeal Mr. Satyanarayana Rao has raised a preliminary point that no appeal lies. The facts are as follows : The appellants were defendants 2 to 14 in three suits-O. S. Nos. 58, 82 and 83 of 1943. There is no appeal by defendant 1. Before suits, attachments before judgment of substantially all the debtors properties were effected. On 21st March 1943, the defendants vakil left hurriedly for Benares to be present with his son, who was stated to be sick with small-pox. On 22nd March, it is said that an oral request was made by defendant 3 for an adjournment. On 25th March, I.A. No. 528 of 1943 was filed-an application to adjourn the case to 5th April which was dismissed; and on that day, ex parte decrees were passed in the three suits. On 2nd April 1943, I.A. Nos. 568, 569 and 570 were filed praying to set aside the three ex parte decrees. On 5th July 1943, an order was passed and in the judgment, the learned Judge said:

On the whole, I should think that the suits should be restored and sufficient costs should be awarded to the respondents as a panacea as was done by his Lordship in the ease quoted above, Venkateswara v. Subramaniam A.I.R. 1939 Mad. 974. I








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top