SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1944 Supreme(Mad) 186

KING
M. G. Natesa Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
S. Subbunarayana Ayyar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

King, J.

1. These appeals are concerned with a village in the Salem district called Chettihalli. The mittadar, or owner of the melwaram right in this village was one Ramakrishna Chettiar (to be referred to hereinafter as the mortgagor). He mortgaged his rights in this and other villages to the plaintiff in O.S. No. 33 of 1940, District Munsifs Court, Dharmapuri from which the present appeals have arisen. This was so long ago as 1921, 1922 and 1923, and was effected by three mortgage deeds. Defendants 1 to 3 in O.S. No. 33 of 1940 are inamdars of Chettihalli whose right consisted in receiving every year from the mittadar one-third of the sum payable by the mittadar to Government as peshkush. Attached to this right is a first charge on the mittadars interests in the village. On 30th June 1933, the defendants sued the mortgagor for arrears of this payment of one-third of the peshkush, and for the enforcement of their charge. They obtained a decree on 10th April 1934, brought the mortgagors property to sale on 24th October 1934, and obtained delivery in execution of their decree on 4th December 1934. To this suit the plaintiff, who, by virtue of defendants prior charge, may now



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top