SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1906 Supreme(Mad) 67

ARNOLD WHITE, SUBRAHMANIA AYYAR
Narayanaswami Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. We do not think it was the intention of the Legislature by the use of the words "Court before whom he is convicted" in Section 562, Criminal Procedure Code, to limit the power of making orders under that Section to the Court of First Instance, The proviso to the Section appears to us inconsistent with the view that this was the intention of the Legislature.

2. We agree with the decision in Emperor v. Birch I.L.R. 24 All. 306.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top