1. Mr. John Adam has argued the question arising in this case fully, and has drawn our attention to all the authorities bearing on it. Except the case Macmillan v. Suresh Chunder Deb I.L.R. Cale. 951, all the other cases are English authorities. The result of them is that in the case of a book which has been published there is no right to sue on account of piracy, except where the copyright has been registered and subsists under statutory provisions (Copinger on Copyright, pages 29 to 23 and Macklin v. Richardson and Goubaud v. Wallace 7 Ruling Cased 66 at pp. 67, 70 and 128 respectively.

2. In the present case the plaintiffs almanac was not registered under Act XX of 1847, nor under Act XXV of 1867, which would be equivalent to registration under the Act of 847.

3. No doubt the plaintiff applied for registration under the Act of 1867, but the Registrar refused to register on the ground that the almanac was exempted from registration by notification of the Government of India, dated December 1871, under Section 21 of the Act. It is argued for the plaintiffs that this is equivalent to registration, but we cannot accede to this contention. It is next urged that having regard to