Lakshmana Rao, J.

1. The plaintiff is the appellant and the suit is for recovery of the plaint property from the respondent the purchaser in execution of the decree in S.C. Suit No. 192 of 1920 obtained by one Subramania Aiyar against Kaliammal the mother of the appellant. The appellant claims the property under the will of his father and the undisputed facts are that the father died in 1916 possessed of the plaint property and other properties situate in the villages of Mangalavaram and Sourirajanpatnam. He left him surviving his widow Kaliammal and son the appellant and after setting out the amount of his debts and charities to be conducted in perpetuity for the welfare of his soul the will directs, Kaliammal to sell the properties in Sourirajanpatnam, discharge the debts, pay Rs. 200 to a temple and invest the balance of sale proceeds in the purchase of properties. The will then provides that Kaliammal should as trustee enjoy the properties so purchased and the Mangalavaram property and out of the income thereof pay the kist, spend Rs. 10 and Rs. 5 annually on two religious charities, give annually an allowance of paddy to the appellant and his wife and another female rel