SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1936 Supreme(Mad) 285

PANDRANG ROW


ORDER

Pandrang Row, J.

1. The petitioner in this case was convicted of a public nuisance, and sentenced Under Section 290, I.P.C., by the Stationary Sub-Magistrate of Chingleput to pay a fine of Rs. 10 and in default of payment, to undergo simple imprisonment for one week. This conviction and sentence were confirmed by the joint Magistrate of Chingleput. The alleged public nuisance was that the petitioner, a respectable man of 55 years, passed urine in a grazing ground poramboke under cover of a tamarind tree in the village of Guduvancheri to which the Towns Nuisances Act does not apply. If the view taken by the Courts below is to be accepted as correct, it would follow that the mere act of passing urine in any public place, in the sense of a place open to the public, would amount to an offence punishable Under Section 290, I.P.C. The essential ingredient of the offence is that the act must cause any common injury, danger or annoyance to the public or to the people in general who dwell or occupy property in the vicinity, or must necessarily cause injury, obstruction, danger or annoyance to persons who may have occasion to use any public right. There is no question of obstruction or d


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top