SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1936 Supreme(Mad) 309

CORNISH
Allavarapu Subbayya – Appellant
Versus
Jakka Peddayya – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Cornish, J.

1. The decree-holder is the appellant. He brought a suit on a promissory note executed by defendant 1, he being the younger brother of defendant 2. The suit was alone contested by defendant 2, but it ended in a compromise. This compromise was embodied in a decree and runs as follows:

That if, out of the suit amount of Rupees 1,383-12-4, the sum of Rs. 800 is paid in two months from this date by the defendants to the plaintiff, that is, on 24th April 1933, in cash, the plaintiff shall give up the remaining suit amount and costs of the suit; that, in case the defendants fail to so pay the sum of Rs. 800 to the plaintiff on 24th April 1933, the plaintiff shall recover the suit amount or Rs. 1,383-12-4 only from the defendants from their moveable and Immovable properties in execution proceedings with execution costs and that as regards the costs in this suit, the plaintiff shall give up his costs and the defendants shall give up their costs.

2. The sum of Rs. 800 was not paid on 24th April 1933; but on that day defendant 1 was allowed by the Court to pay Rs. 500 and was given time up to 3rd May 1933 to pay the balance of Rs. 300. As a matter of fact, he paid the balanc



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top